Exploring students' perceptions on the use of significant event analysis, as part of a portfolio assessment process in general practice, as a tool for learning how to use reflection in learning
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Aug 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Sep 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joy Rudland|
|2 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean Ker|
|10 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Murdoch-Eaton|
|8 Nov 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Vermunt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Nov 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joy Rudland|
|8 Jan 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean Ker|
|2 Mar 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Vermunt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Mar 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Mar 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Vermunt|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|30 Mar 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Mar 2007||Editorially accepted|
|30 Mar 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-7-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.