Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Exploring students' perceptions on the use of significant event analysis, as part of a portfolio assessment process in general practice, as a tool for learning how to use reflection in learning

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Aug 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joy Rudland
2 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Ker
10 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Murdoch-Eaton
8 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jan Vermunt
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joy Rudland
8 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jean Ker
2 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Jan Vermunt
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Jan Vermunt
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
30 Mar 2007 Editorially accepted
30 Mar 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-7-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement