Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Apr 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Apr 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jon Veloski
27 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Swanson
5 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Fischer
25 Jul 2007 Author responded Author comments - Edward Palmer
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jul 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jon Veloski
18 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Swanson
31 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Fischer
22 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Edward Palmer
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Nov 2007 Author responded Author comments - Edward Palmer
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Nov 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Nov 2007 Editorially accepted
28 Nov 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-7-49

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement