Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceptions on the importance of gerontological education by teachers and students of undergraduate health sciences

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jun 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Stolee
29 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Diachun
3 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hollis Day
26 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Diachun
15 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Stolee
16 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hollis Day
12 Dec 2006 Author responded Author comments - Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Dec 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Stolee
8 Jan 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laura Diachun
16 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Jan 2007 Editorially accepted
19 Jan 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-7-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement