Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Jun 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Jul 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Schwartz|
|26 Jul 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gordon Page|
|13 Aug 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Rotthoff|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Aug 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Schwartz|
|30 Aug 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gordon Page|
|27 Sep 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Rotthoff|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Sep 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Oct 2006||Editorially accepted|
|10 Oct 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-6-50|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.