Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jun 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Schwartz
26 Jul 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gordon Page
13 Aug 2006 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Rotthoff
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Aug 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Schwartz
30 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gordon Page
27 Sep 2006 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Rotthoff
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Sep 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 Oct 2006 Editorially accepted
10 Oct 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-6-50

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement