Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Learners' decisions for attending Pediatric Grand Rounds: a qualitative and quantitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jan 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jocelyn Lockyer
29 Jan 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Allen
21 Feb 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jack Dolcourt
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Feb 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Feb 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jocelyn Lockyer
5 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Allen
5 Apr 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jack Dolcourt
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Apr 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Allen
17 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jocelyn Lockyer
22 Apr 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jack Dolcourt
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Apr 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Apr 2006 Editorially accepted
27 Apr 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-6-26

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement