Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Knowledge, attitudes and practices on cervical cancer screening among the medical workers of Mulago Hospital, Uganda

  • Twaha Mutyaba1,
  • Francis A Mmiro1 and
  • Elisabete Weiderpass2, 3Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Education20066:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-13

Received: 26 August 2005

Accepted: 01 March 2006

Published: 01 March 2006

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Aug 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Sep 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hendrik Stefanus Cronjé
7 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Elisabete Weiderpass
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Elisabete Weiderpass
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jan 2006 Author responded Author comments - Elisabete Weiderpass
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Jan 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
1 Mar 2006 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-6-13

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mulago Hospital, Makerere Medical School, Kampala, Uganda
(2)
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
(3)
The Cancer Registry of Norway, Montebello, Norway

Advertisement