Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Teaching appropriate interactions with pharmaceutical company representatives: The impact of an innovative workshop on student attitudes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allen Shaughnessy
4 Jun 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin
18 Aug 2004 Author responded Author comments - James Wofford
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Aug 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Aug 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allen Shaughnessy
30 Aug 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin
29 Sep 2004 Author responded Author comments - James Wofford
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Sep 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joel Lexchin
8 Dec 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Allen Shaughnessy
20 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - James Wofford
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - James Wofford
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
8 Feb 2005 Editorially accepted
8 Feb 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-5-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement