Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Stakeholder views regarding cultural diversity teaching outcomes: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Apr 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
10 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Nisha Dogra
Resubmission - Version 2
10 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Desiree Lie
8 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kamila Hawthorne
4 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - Nisha Dogra
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - Nisha Dogra
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Aug 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kamila Hawthorne
16 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - Nisha Dogra
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Oct 2005 Author responded Author comments - Nisha Dogra
Resubmission - Version 6
31 Oct 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
1 Nov 2005 Editorially accepted
1 Nov 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-5-37

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement