Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evolutionary explanations in medical and health profession courses: are you answering your students' "why" questions?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Sep 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Randolph Nesse
5 Dec 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ernest Loten
7 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - AVELIN MALYANGO
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Feb 2005 Author responded Author comments - AVELIN MALYANGO
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Feb 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
1 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Randolph Nesse
9 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - AVELIN MALYANGO
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Randolph Nesse
2 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - AVELIN MALYANGO
Resubmission - Version 5
2 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - AVELIN MALYANGO
Resubmission - Version 6
2 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
10 May 2005 Editorially accepted
10 May 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-5-16

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement