Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cardiac auscultation training of medical students: a comparison of electronic sensor-based and acoustic stethoscopes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Mar 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Apr 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andres Jaussi
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
27 Apr 2005 Author responded Author comments - Henning Høyte
Resubmission - Version 8
27 Apr 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 8
1 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andres Jaussi
8 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Henning Høyte
Resubmission - Version 9
8 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
9 May 2005 Editorially accepted
9 May 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-5-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement