Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Being uninformed on informed consent: a pilot survey of medical education faculty

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Oct 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Dec 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James DuBois
6 Dec 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Lehmann
20 Dec 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristi Ferguson
31 Jan 2005 Author responded Author comments - Brian Mavis
Resubmission - Version 2
31 Jan 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James DuBois
4 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Lehmann
21 Mar 2005 Author responded Author comments - Brian Mavis
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Mar 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Apr 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa Lehmann
25 Apr 2005 Author responded Author comments - Brian Mavis
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Apr 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 Apr 2005 Editorially accepted
25 Apr 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-5-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement