Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Restrictions impeding web-based courses: a survey of publishers' variation in authorising access to high quality on-line literature

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Oct 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Oct 2003 Author responded Author comments - Michele Langlois
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Oct 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Nov 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaret Holmes-Rovner
24 Nov 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh
6 Feb 2004 Author responded Author comments - Michele Langlois
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Feb 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Feb 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Trisha Greenhalgh
25 Feb 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaret Holmes-Rovner
10 Mar 2004 Author responded Author comments - Michele Langlois
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Mar 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Apr 2004 Editorially accepted
7 Apr 2004 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-4-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement