Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A randomized trial comparing digital and live lecture formats [ISRCTN40455708

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jul 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Aug 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Callas
18 Aug 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Steele
28 Aug 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Wofford
10 Sep 2004 Author responded Author comments - David Solomon
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Sep 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Peter Callas
21 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Steele
2 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Wofford
14 Nov 2004 Author responded Author comments - David Solomon
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Nov 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
29 Nov 2004 Editorially accepted
29 Nov 2004 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-4-27

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement