Table 1 Distribution of course evaluation.
Question | Rating | Group I 2002 n (%) | Group II 2003 n (%) | χ2 | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Use made of timetabled hours available for the subject | 1 | 95 (88%) | 101 (89%) | ||
2 | 13 (12%) | 12 (11%) | 0.1106079 | > 0.05 | |
3 | 0 | 0 | |||
2. Lecturers' concern for students' | 1 | 85 (79%) | 98 (87%) | ||
learning | 2 | 14 (13%) | 9 (8%) | 2.4986106 | > 0.05 |
3 | 9 (8%) | 6 (5%) | |||
3. Clarity of theory classes and lecturers' teaching abilities | 1 | 72 (67%) | 98 (87%) | ||
2 | 31 (29%) | 12 (11%) | 12.765231 | < 0.05 * | |
3 | 5 (4%) | 3 (2 %) | |||
4. Lecturers' punctuality | 1 | 108 (100%) | 81 (72%) | ||
2 | 0 | 32 (28%) | 32.620532 | < 0.001 * | |
3 | 0 | 0 | |||
5. Quality of knowledge assessment tests | 1 | 38 (35%) | 73 (65%) | ||
2 | 49 (45%) | 34 (30%) | 21.978341 | < 0.001 * | |
3 | 21 (20%) | 6 (5 %) | |||
6. Students' learning of the subject | 1 | 60 (56%) | 97 (86%) | ||
2 | 46 (42%) | 13 (12%) | 24.619225 | < 0.001 * | |
3 | 2 (2 %) | 3 (2%) | |||
7. General evaluation of the subject | 1 | 80 (74%) | 100 (89%) | ||
2 | 25 (23%) | 10 (9%) | 7.6007955 | < 0.05 * | |
3 | 3 (3 %) | 3 (2%) |