Factors affecting the intention of providers to deliver more effective continuing medical education to general practitioners: a pilot study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Oct 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gosta Eliasson|
|19 Nov 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Linda Casebeer|
|12 Dec 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Tania Winzenberg|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Dec 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Dec 2003||Editorially accepted|
|14 Dec 2003||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-3-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.