Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The role of strategy and redundancy in diagnostic reasoning

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jul 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Jul 2002 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Bloch
16 Aug 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Geoff Norman
2 Oct 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Lynch
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Jul 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Bloch
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Nov 2002 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Bloch
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Nov 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Jan 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Lynch
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Jan 2003 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Bloch
Resubmission - Version 6
21 Jan 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 Jan 2003 Editorially accepted
24 Jan 2003 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-3-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement