This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The role of strategy and redundancy in diagnostic reasoning
© Bloch et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 23 July 2002
Accepted: 24 January 2003
Published: 24 January 2003
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Jul 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Jul 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ralph Bloch|
|16 Aug 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Geoff Norman|
|2 Oct 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Lynch|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Jul 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Nov 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ralph Bloch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Nov 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Nov 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ralph Bloch|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Nov 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Jan 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Lynch|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|21 Jan 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Ralph Bloch|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|21 Jan 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|24 Jan 2003||Editorially accepted|
|24 Jan 2003||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-3-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.