Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluating team-based, lecture-based, and hybrid learning methods for neurology clerkship in China: a method-comparison study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Sep 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Lian-hong YANG
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Lian-hong YANG
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - Lian-hong YANG
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
7 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Mary Weller
10 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matt Boyd
2 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Lian-hong YANG
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Lian-hong YANG
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Lian-hong YANG
Resubmission - Version 7
21 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
17 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Lian-hong YANG
Resubmission - Version 8
17 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 8
29 Apr 2014 Author responded Author comments - Lian-hong YANG
Resubmission - Version 9
29 Apr 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
14 May 2014 Editorially accepted
20 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-14-98

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement