Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Dec 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ehsan Bahrampour
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Ehsan Bahrampour
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sunčana Kukolja
13 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - erol gurpinar
2 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Ehsan Bahrampour
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sunčana Kukolja
17 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - erol gurpinar
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
5 Mar 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-14-45

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement