This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study
© Moazami et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 11 December 2013
Accepted: 19 February 2014
Published: 5 March 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ehsan Bahrampour|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ehsan Bahrampour|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sunčana Kukolja|
|13 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - erol gurpinar|
|2 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Ehsan Bahrampour|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sunčana Kukolja|
|17 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - erol gurpinar|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|5 Mar 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-14-45|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.