Information item | Number of participants | Reinforce n = 76 (68%) | Replicate n = 14 (13%) | Understand n = 14 (13%) | Philosophy n = 7 (6%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aims and objectives of the educational intervention | 3 | x | xx | Â | Â |
Teaching/learning strategies | 5 | xxxx | x | Â | Â |
Learning objectives | 7 | xxxxx | xx | Â | Â |
Duration of each session | 2 | xx | Â | Â | Â |
Number of face to face teaching/learning sessions | 7 | xxxx | xx | Â | x |
Duration of each entire educational program | 1 | x | Â | Â | Â |
Frequency of the teaching/learning sessions | 0 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Any post-intervention activities required | 1 | x | Â | Â | Â |
Theoretical basis/educational framework used | 5 | xxxx | x | Â | Â |
The specific educational materials/resources used | 3 | xx | x | Â | Â |
Any pre-intervention readings/activities required | 0 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Detail of EBP components/content | 2 | x | x | Â | Â |
Process used to ensure fidelity of teaching/delivery | 7 | xx | Â | xxx | xx |
Timing of intervention | 3 | xx | Â | x | Â |
Supporting structures in organisation to maintain behaviours targeted by intervention | 3 | xxx | Â | Â | Â |
Extent of peer interaction | 0 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
What post-training support was provided | 0 | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Face to face contact time with learners | 8 | xxxxxx | x | Â | x |
Whether any identified barriers were targeted | 2 | x | Â | Â | x |
Whether follow-up sessions planned | 1 | X | Â | Â | Â |
Training required for instructors to teach the intervention | 1 | x | Â | Â | Â |
Non-face to face contact time with learners | 2 | xx | Â | Â | Â |
Instructors commitment to specific content of teaching | 5 | xx | Â | xx | x |
Student time NOT covered by face to face contact | 2 | xx | Â | Â | Â |
What method was used to decide content | 1 | Â | Â | x | Â |
Number of instructors/teachers involved | 4 | xx | x | x | Â |
Ratio of learners to teachers | 5 | xxx | x | x | Â |
Instructors commitment to format of teaching | 5 | xxxx | Â | x | Â |
Whether the same instructor was used for all teaching | 3 | xx | Â | Â | x |
Whether a systematic method was used beforehand to identify barriers | 1 | Â | Â | x | Â |
Whether program will be compared across different sites | 3 | xxx | Â | Â | Â |
Settings where teaching/learning sessions undertaken | 4 | xx | Â | xx | Â |
Description of teaching experience/expertise | 3 | xx | x | Â | Â |
Profession of instructors | 4 | xxxx | Â | Â | Â |
Whether educational intervention was endorsed by an academic, educational or professional institution | 2 | xx | Â | Â | Â |
Who was involved in designing the content | 1 | x | Â | Â | Â |
Relation of instructor to learners/program | 4 | xxx | Â | x | Â |
Who designed the intervention | 1 | x | Â | Â | Â |
To what extent did the hosting agency facilitate training | 0 | Â | Â | Â | Â |