Aims and objectives of the educational intervention*
|
26
|
10.0 (0.9)
|
10.0
|
0.6
|
85
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
Yes
|
Teaching/learning strategies+
|
26
|
9.5 (1.6)
|
10.0
|
1.1
|
69
|
23
|
4
|
4
|
Yes
|
Learning objectives*
|
26
|
9.4 (1.1)
|
10.0
|
0.6
|
81
|
19
|
0
|
0
|
Yes
|
Duration of each session+
|
26
|
9.4 (1.5)
|
9.0
|
1.1
|
69
|
23
|
8
|
0
|
Yes
|
Number of face to face teaching/learning sessions+
|
26
|
9.3 (1.7)
|
9.0
|
1.2
|
69
|
23
|
4
|
4
|
Yes
|
Duration of each entire educational program+
|
26
|
9.3 (2.0)
|
9.0
|
1.1
|
73
|
19
|
4
|
4
|
Yes
|
Frequency of the teaching/learning sessions+
|
26
|
9.3 (2.8)
|
9.0
|
1.1
|
73
|
19
|
4
|
4
|
Yes
|
Any post-intervention activities required+
|
26
|
9.2 (1.3)
|
9.0
|
1.0
|
62
|
30
|
8
|
0
|
Yes
|
Theoretical basis/educational framework used+
|
26
|
9.0 (1.6)
|
9.0
|
1.3
|
50
|
30
|
20
|
0
|
Yes
|
The specific educational materials/resources used+
|
26
|
9.0 (1.9)
|
9.0
|
1.3
|
50
|
38
|
12
|
0
|
Yes
|
Any pre-intervention readings/activities required+
|
26
|
8.9 (1.3)
|
8.5
|
1.1
|
50
|
46
|
4
|
0
|
Yes
|
Detail of EBP components/content+
|
25
|
8.9 (1.4)
|
9.0
|
1.0
|
68
|
28
|
4
|
0
|
Yes
|
Process used to ensure fidelity of teaching/delivery
|
25
|
8.9 (1.8)
|
9.0
|
1.1
|
56
|
16
|
28
|
0
|
Likely
|
Timing of intervention
|
26
|
8.0 (2.3)
|
8.0
|
1.6
|
30
|
46
|
12
|
12
|
Likely
|
Supporting structures in organisation to maintain behaviours targeted by intervention+
|
26
|
7.9 (1.4)
|
8.0
|
1.0
|
34
|
54
|
12
|
0
|
Yes
|
Extent of peer interaction
|
25
|
7.9 (2.3)
|
8.0
|
1.5
|
24
|
52
|
12
|
12
|
Likely
|
What post-training support was provided+
|
26
|
7.8 (1.7)
|
8.0
|
1.4
|
38
|
42
|
15
|
5
|
Yes
|
Face to face contact time with learners+
|
26
|
7.8 (1.9)
|
8.0
|
1.3
|
38
|
46
|
8
|
8
|
Yes
|
Whether any identified barriers were targeted +
|
26
|
7.6 (1.4)
|
7.5
|
1.2
|
27
|
58
|
15
|
0
|
Yes
|
Whether follow-up sessions planned+
|
26
|
7.5 (1.7)
|
8.0
|
1.2
|
27
|
54
|
15
|
4
|
Yes
|
Training required for instructors to teach the intervention
|
25
|
7.3 (1.7)
|
7.0
|
1.4
|
28
|
40
|
32
|
0
|
Likely
|
Non-face to face contact time with learners
|
26
|
7.2 (2.1)
|
8.0
|
1.6
|
27
|
42
|
19
|
12
|
Likely
|
Instructors commitment to specific content of teaching
|
26
|
7.2 (2.1)
|
8.0
|
1.5
|
27
|
42
|
23
|
8
|
Likely
|
Student time NOT covered by face to face contact
|
26
|
7.2 (1.8)
|
8.0
|
1.4
|
19
|
50
|
23
|
8
|
Likely
|
What method was used to decide content
|
25
|
7.1 (2.3)
|
7.0
|
1.9
|
32
|
32
|
20
|
16
|
Likely
|
Number of instructors/teachers involved
|
25
|
7.0 (1.8)
|
7.0
|
1.2
|
12
|
60
|
24
|
4
|
Likely
|
Ratio of learners to teachers
|
25
|
6.9 (1.8)
|
7.0
|
1.1
|
12
|
64
|
16
|
8
|
Likely
|
Instructors commitment to format of teaching
|
26
|
6.8 (2.3)
|
8.0
|
1.7
|
20
|
42
|
23
|
15
|
Likely
|
Whether the same instructor was used for all teaching
|
25
|
6.8 (2.0)
|
7.0
|
1.4
|
16
|
52
|
24
|
8
|
Likely
|
Whether a systematic method was used beforehand to identify barriers
|
26
|
6.8 (1.5)
|
6.0
|
1.2
|
15
|
31
|
50
|
4
|
Consider
|
Whether program will be compared across different sites
|
26
|
6.6 (2.4)
|
7.0
|
1.8
|
20
|
42
|
23
|
15
|
Likely
|
Settings where teaching/learning sessions undertaken
|
26
|
6.5 (1.9)
|
7.0
|
1.2
|
8
|
62
|
15
|
15
|
Likely
|
Description of teaching experience/expertise
|
24
|
6.5 (1.6)
|
6.0
|
1.2
|
13
|
38
|
42
|
12
|
Consider
|
Profession of instructors
|
25
|
6.1 (2.6)
|
7.0
|
2.0
|
12
|
40
|
24
|
24
|
Likely
|
Whether educational intervention was endorsed by an academic, educational or professional institution
|
27
|
6.1 (2.7)
|
7.0
|
2.1
|
22
|
26
|
33
|
19
|
Consider
|
Who was involved in designing the content
|
26
|
5.7 (2.8)
|
6.0
|
2.3
|
23
|
15
|
35
|
27
|
Consider
|
Relation of instructor to learners/program
|
26
|
5.5 (2.2)
|
5.0
|
1.5
|
12
|
12
|
50
|
26
|
Consider
|
Who designed the intervention
|
26
|
5.2 (3.3)
|
5.0
|
2.5
|
27
|
8
|
19
|
46
|
Unlikely
|
To what extent did the hosting agency facilitate training+
|
26
|
4.8 (2.1)
|
5.0
|
1.5
|
8
|
12
|
46
|
34
|
No
|