Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should be reported: Stage 2 of the development of a reporting guideline

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Feb 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Anna Phillips
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Banks
16 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Misa Mi
21 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fares Alahdab
16 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Anna Phillips
Resubmission - Version 3
16 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Anna Phillips
Resubmission - Version 4
16 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Anna Phillips
Resubmission - Version 5
20 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
26 Jun 2014 Editorially accepted
31 Jul 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-14-159

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement