Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in EBP knowledge and skills of the EBP group in each item of the AFT over time periods

From: Effectiveness of the tailored Evidence Based Practice training program for Filipino physical therapists: a randomized controlled trial

Questions in the AFT

Pre training scores

Post training

3 months post training

(median, IQR)

(median, IQR)

(median, IQR)

EBP group

Waitlist control

Pre training

EBP group

Waitlist control

Post training

EBP group

Waitlist control

3 months post training

(N = 27)

(N = 27)

(p value)

(N = 27)

(N = 27)

(p value)

(N = 27)

(N = 27)

(p value)

Q1 (0–12 points)

5.0 (3.0- 7.8)

5.0 (3.0-6.0)

0.41

10.0 (9.0-12.0)

6.0 (3.0- 8.8)

0.0001*

9.0 (9.0-12.0)

4.0 (3.0-6.8)

0.0001*

Writing a focused question using the PICO

Q2 (0–24)

6.0 (4.0-8.0)

7.0 (0.0-10.0)

0.87

8.0 (6.0-13.5)

6.0 (2.0-10.0)

0.1036

8.0 (6.0-13)

4.0 (2.0-7.5)

0.0006*

Sources of information; advantages and disadvantages

Q3 (0–24)

0.0 (0.0-6.0)

0.0 (0.0-5.3)

0.98

12.0 (12.0-12.0)

0.0 (0.0-6.0)

<0.0001*

12.0 (6.0-12.0)

0.0 (0.0-2.3)

0.0005*

Study design that would answer the question

Q4 (0–24)

0.0 (0.0-2.3)

0.0 (0.0-7.5)

0.48

12.0 (6.0-15.5)

0.0 (0.0-6.0)

0.0001*

8.0 (6.5-14.0)

0.0 (0.0-3.0)

<0.0001*

Search strategy

Q5 (0–24)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.96

5.0 (5.0-14.0)

0.0 (0.0-5.0)

0.0002*

5.0 (0.0-14)

0.0 (0.0-4.5)

0.0038*

How is relevance of the study determined?

Q6 (0–24)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.77

10.0 (5.0-10.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

<0.0001*

5.0 (0.0-10.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.0005*

How is validity of the study determined?

Q7 (0–24)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.70

5.0 (5.0-9.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

0.0001*

5.0 (1.3-5.0)

0.0 (0.0-0.0)

<0.0001*

How are magnitude and significance determined?

  1. *significant p value; Mann- Whitney U test was used to calculate for differences between groups.