This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency
© Hodgins and Veillette; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 7 June 2012
Accepted: 22 April 2013
Published: 1 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeff Leiter|
|5 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthias Knobe|
|5 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Justin Hodgins|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jeff Leiter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|1 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-13-61|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.