Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency

Contributed equally
BMC Medical Education201313:61

Received: 7 June 2012

Accepted: 22 April 2013

Published: 1 May 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
7 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeff Leiter
5 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthias Knobe
5 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Justin Hodgins
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeff Leiter
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
1 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-13-61

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
University of Toronto Sports Medicine Program, Women’s CollegeHospital, Toronto, Canada