Comparison of the medical students’ perceived self-efficacy and the evaluation of the observers and patients
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jette Ammentorp|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Walter Chen|
|17 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rashmi Kusurkar|
|19 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jette Ammentorp|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|8 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-13-49|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.