Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparisons between the intervention and the control group in perceived preparedness, perceived knowledge, actual knowledge and detection of new cases

From: Measuring the effectiveness of an intensive IPV training program offered to Greek general practitioners and residents of general practice

 

Intervention

Control

Mann–Whitney Test

 

(n = 11)

(n = 14)

   
 

Median (Min/max)

Median (Min/max)

U

Effect size (r)

P-value

Perceived Preparedness

     

Baseline

3.55 (2.22-6.11)

4.77 (2.44-5.67)

50.0

.30

.138

Post-intervention

5.22 (3.67-5.89)

4.27 (2.78-6.11)

31.0

.50

.012

12-month

4.77 (3.67-5.89)

3.77 (2.33-5.44)

36.0

.45

.024

Perceived knowledge

     

Baseline

3.06 (1.50-5.75)

3.59 (1.38-4.44)

72.0

.05

.784

Post-intervention

5.31 (3.38-5.94)

3.87 (2.25-5.44)

15.0

.68

.001

12-month

5.31 (3.38-5.88)

3.50 (2.19-5.19)

27.5

.54

.007

Actual knowledge

     

Baseline

20.0 (16.0-27.0)

17.0 (8.0-26.0)

28.0

.54

.007

Post-intervention

27.0 (13.0-31.0)

17.0 (12.0-28.0)

43.0

.37

.061

12-month

21.0 (15.0-28.0)

18.0 (12.0-25.0)

41.0

.40

.047

Detection of new cases 1,2

n (%)

n (%)

χ2

df

p-value

Baseline

5 (45.5)

9 (64.3)

.887

1

.435

12-month

7 (63.6)

12 (85.7)

1.646

1

.350

  1. 1 n(%) of GPs who detected new cases in the past year.
  2. 2Chi-square test, Monte Carlo simulation, level of statistical significance .05.