Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons between the intervention group I (GPs) and the intervention group II (Residents) in perceived preparedness, perceived knowledge, actual knowledge and detection of new cases

From: Measuring the effectiveness of an intensive IPV training program offered to Greek general practitioners and residents of general practice

 

GPs (n = 11)

Residents (n = 15)

Mann–Whitney Test

Perceived Preparedness

Median (Min/max)

Median (Min/max)

U

Effect size (r)

P-value

Baseline

3.55 (2.22-6.11)

3.00 (2.00-4.89)

54.0

.29

.138

Post-intervention

5.22 (3.67-5.89)

4.33 (2.67-6.00)

42.5

.41

.037

12-month

4.77 (3.67-5.89)

4.44 (2.56-6.00)

61.5

.21

.274

Perceived knowledge

     

Baseline

3.06 (1.50-5.75)

2.93 (1.81-4.81)

71.5

.11

.567

Post-intervention

5.31 (3.38-5.94)

4.75 (2.00-6.00)

51.0

.32

.101

12-month

5.31 (3.38-5.88)

4.18 (2.38-6.00)

47.0

.36

.064

Actual knowledge

     

Baseline

20.0 (16.0-27.0)

21.0 (13.0-27.0)

78.5

.04

.833

Post-intervention

27.0 (13.0-31.0)

26.0 (20.0-30.0)

68.5

.14

.464

12-month

21.0 (15.0-28.0)

25.0 (20.0-31.0)

34.5

.49

.012

Detection of new cases 1,2

n (%)

n (%)

χ2

df

p-value

Baseline

5 (45.5)

6 (40.0)

.077

1

.781

12-month

7 (63.6)

11 (73.3)

.280

1

.683

  1. 1 n(%) of GPs/residents who detected new cases in the past year.
  2. 2 Chi-square test, Monte Carlo simulation, level of statistical significance .05.