Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceptions of UK medical graduates’ preparedness for practice: A multi-centre qualitative study reflecting the importance of learning on the job

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Nov 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Murdoch-Eaton
21 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Cleland
24 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Bleakley
1 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Illing
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Cleland
2 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Bleakley
13 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jan Illing
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Bleakley
17 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Cleland
18 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Murdoch-Eaton
4 Feb 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jan Illing
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Feb 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
28 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-13-34

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement