Open Peer Review Reports for: Perceptions of UK medical graduates’ preparedness for practice: A multi-centre qualitative study reflecting the importance of learning on the job
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
28 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deborah Murdoch-Eaton |
21 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jennifer Cleland |
24 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Bleakley |
1 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Illing |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
22 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jennifer Cleland |
2 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Bleakley |
13 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Illing |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
15 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Bleakley |
17 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jennifer Cleland |
18 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Deborah Murdoch-Eaton |
4 Feb 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Jan Illing |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Feb 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
19 Feb 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Feb 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-34 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.