Skip to content


BMC Medical Education

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Computer game-based and traditional learning method: a comparison regarding students’ knowledge retention

  • Silmara Rondon1,
  • Fernanda Chiarion Sassi1 and
  • Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade1, 2Email author
BMC Medical Education201313:30

Received: 5 September 2012

Accepted: 20 February 2013

Published: 25 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
5 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Georgina Selby
13 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frederick Kron
17 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Claudia Andrade
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Georgina Selby
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
25 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-13-30

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Physiotherapy, Speech-Language and Hearing Sciences and Occupational Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Rua Cipotânea, 51 – Cidade Universitária, São Paulo/S.P, Brazil