Skip to main content

Table 3 Specific EBP content taught in the physical therapy curriculum (n = 28)

From: Teaching evidence based practice in physical therapy in a developing country: a national survey of Philippine schools

EBP content

n

(%)

Asking clinical question and searching for evidence

  

 Formulating clinically relevant questions using PICO formata

16

57.1

 Different types of clinical questions to guide literature searchb

20

71.4

 Constructing focused search strategya

19

67.9

 Locating clinical evidence using electronic databasesa

19

67.9

Critically appraising evidence

  

 Commonly used study designs and their major strength and limitationsa

21

75.0

 Assessing relevance of study design to clinical questiona

16

57.1

 Hierarchy or levels of evidencea

13

46.4

 Differences among narrative review, systematic review and meta-analysisa

16

57.1

 Difference between clinical and statistical significancea

15

53.6

 Interpreting results of statistical procedures such as t tests, chi-square testsa

20

71.4

 Interpreting results of statistics such as p-value, confidence intervala

17

60.7

 Understanding sensitivity and specificity, number needed to treat, odds ratioa

16

57.1

 Understanding intention to treat analysis, power calculationa

10

35.7

 Use of appraisal tools to assess validitya

12

42.9

 Ways in which study validity can be threateneda

16

57.1

 Difference between internal and external validitya

19

67.9

 Critical appraisal of systematic reviewsa

9

32.1

 Interpreting forest plots in systematic reviewsa

5

17.9

 Critical appraisal of studies about interventionb

14

50.0

 Critical appraisal of studies about diagnosisb

12

42.9

 Critical appraisal of studies about prognosisb

12

42.9

Integrating evidence and communicating results

  

 Deciding on appropriate clinical decision considering patient’s needs and treatment preferencesa

18

64.3

 Communicating results of appraisal at level appropriate to individual patienta

13

46.4

  1. aConsidered appropriate for undergraduate-level education by majority (at least 50%) of participants who did not teach this content in undergraduate curriculum.
  2. bConsidered appropriate for postgraduate-level education by majority (at least 50%) of participants who did not teach this content in undergraduate curriculum.