Personality traits predict job stress, depression and anxiety among junior physicians

BMC Medical Education

Table 3 Structural equation analyses

Prediction of:	Perceived job stress (CJSQ)			HADS anxiety			HADS depression
Sample:	Total	Females	Males	Total	Females	Males	Total	Females	Males
Neuroticism	.20	0	.36	0	0	0	0	0	0
Extroversion	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Conscientiousness	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Reality weakness	0	0	0	.32	.25	.40	.28	.22	.43
CJSQ	-	-	-	.44	.52	.34	.34	.38	.24
R²	.04	.00	.13	.33	.33	.34	.22	.19	.29
Goodness of fit				MS^a			MS^a
χ², df, p-value				13.36	15	.58	10.22	15	.81
NFI				.90			.91
NNFI				1.03			1.11
RMSEA with C.I.^b				.00	.000	.070	.00	.000	.050
RMSEA close fit				.85			.95

Structural equation analyses of the perceived job stress, anxiety and depression variables. HADS Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. CJSQ Cooper’s Job Stress Questionnaire.
All reported parameter values are statistically significant at .05-level. Relationships given as zero indicate no statistical significant association.
MS^a Multi-sample analysis of females and males in one model.
C.I.^b Confidence interval with 95% low and high cut-off values.

ISSN: 1472-6920