Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Communication training for advanced medical students improves information recall of medical laypersons in simulated informed consent talks – a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wolf Axel Langewitz
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sabine Fischbeck
29 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcy Rosenbaum
30 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Simmenroth-Nayda
11 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Nora Celebi
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sabine Fischbeck
19 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marcy Rosenbaum
20 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Simmenroth-Nayda
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
16 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
1 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-13-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement