Table 4 Agreement on sections that should contribute to the assessment of the portfolio
| Â | Supervisors n=23 (%) | Registrars n=26 (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
Achieving the goals in the learning plan | 22 (95.6) | 23 (88.4) | 0.36 |
Achieving the required number of entries for specific items e.g. number of observations | 20 (86.9) | 15 (57.7) | 0.02 |
Evidence of improvement during the year e.g. improvement in rating of skills | 21 (91.3) | 20 (76.9) | 0.17 |
Evidence of critical reflection on one’s experience, growth and development e.g. reflections on rotations | 23 (100.0) | 23 (88.4) | 0.09 |
Assessments by the supervisor e.g. at the end of rotations | 23 (100.0) | 24 (92.3) | 0.17 |
Assessments given for specific items in the portfolio during the year e.g. assignments included in the portfolio | 20 (86.9) | 23 (88.4) | 0.87 |
The logbook satisfactorily completed | 22 (95.6) | 22 (84.6) | 0.20 |
The overall presentation and layout | 17 (73.9) | 19 (73.1) | 0.95 |