Skip to main content

Table 5 Intragroup-comparison between T1 and T2

From: Evaluating an evidence-based curriculum in undergraduate palliative care education: piloting a phase II exploratory trial for a complex intervention

Construct (No.)

Groups

T1 M ± SD

T2 M ± SD

t

df

p-value

MD

95%CI

(2)

IG

21.4 ± 6.82

37.3 ± 6.65

−9.2

9

<.001 *

−15.9

−19.81, -11.99

CG

22.56 ± 7.05

24.19 ± 7.53

-.7.9

15

.44

−1.63

−6.01, 2.76

(3)

IG

12.0 ± 4.32

23.6 ± 5.58

−4.8

9

.001 *

−11.6

−17.07, -6.13

CG

14 ± 5.02

13.69 ± 6.12

.22

15

.83

.31

−2.68, 3.31

(4)

IG

8.3 ± 2.11

13.2 ± 2.7

−4.62

9

.001 *

−4.9

−7.3, -2.5

CG

7.88 ± 2.19

8.75 ± 2.89

−1.73

15

.11

-.88

−1.96, .21

(5.1)

IG

18.8 ± 5.43

20.0 ± 4.19

-.73

9

.48

−1.2

−4.91, 2.51

CG

23.88 ± 6.52

23.75 ± 6.28

.1

15

.92

.13

−2.56, 2.81

(5.2)

IG

11.3 ± 2.0

14 ± 4.32

−1.52

9

.163

−2.7

−6.72, 1.32

CG

14.94 ± 5.18

15.63 ± 6.12

-.77

15

.45

-.69

−2.59, 1.22

(5.3)

IG

13.6 ± 2.95

15.9 ± 3.96

−1.8

9

.11

−2.3

−5.18, .58

CG

18.06 ± 4.45

17.88 ± 5.11

.22

15

.83

.19

−1.63, 2.0

(5.4)

IG

17.7 ± 6.07

21.8 ± 7.01

−1.76

9

.112

−4.1

−9.36, 1.16

 

CG

19.25 ± 4.82

20.25 ± 5.64

−1.09

15

.293

−1.0

−2.96, .96

  1. Legend: (2) Willingness to accompany dying patients; (3) Self-estimation of competence in communication with dying patients and their relatives; (4) self-estimation of knowledge and skills in PC; (5.1) Attitude towards death of self; (5.2) Attitude towards dying of self; (5.3) Attitude towards death of others; (5.4) Attitude towards dying of others. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; MD = mean difference; * significant.
  2. Comparison in the groups between T1 and T2 shows statistical significant results for constructs (2), (3) and (4). Data of (1) is not presented because that construct has proved to be unreliable.