Table 5 Med student evaluation of teaching attending
From: Improving teaching on an inpatient pediatrics service: a retrospective analysis of a program change
Superior (score of 5) vs. other | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | 2005-2006 | 2006-2007 | Odds Ratio 05–06 vs 06-07 | 2007-2008 | Odds Ratio 05–06 vs 07-08 | |||
80 | 78 | 75 | ||||||
# | % | # | % | # | % | |||
Medical Knowledge | 68 | 85 | 66 | 85 | 1.0 (0.4-2.6) | 67 | 89 | 1.5 (0.5-4.4) |
Stimulates Critical Thinking | 58 | 73 | 66 | 85 | 2.1 (0.9-5.0) | 66 | 88 | 2.8 (1.1-7.4) |
Quality of Didactic sessions | 49 | 61 | 67 | 86 | 3.9 (1.7-9.3) | 60 | 80 | 2.5 (1.2-5.6) |
Clarity of Expectations | 51 | 64 | 62 | 79 | 2.2 (1.0-4.8) | 55 | 73 | 1.6 (0.7-3.3) |
Availability | 50 | 63 | 62 | 79 | 2.3 (1.1-5.1) | 62 | 83 | 2.9 (1.3-6.6) |
Approachability | 62 | 78 | 73 | 94 | 4.2(1.4-15.3) | 66 | 88 | 2.1 (0.8-5.8) |
Teaching Commitment | 66 | 83 | 74 | 95 | 3.9 (1.1-17.0) | 71 | 95 | 3.8 (1.1-16.4) |
Feedback/Evaluation (Written/Verbal Skills) | 36 | 45 | 62 | 79 | 4.7 (2.2-10.3) | 64 | 85 | 7.1 (3.1-17.0) |
Feedback/Evaluation (Data Gathering/Physical Exam) | 23 | 29 | 49 | 63 | 4.2 (2.0-8.6) | 54 | 72 | 6.4 (3.0-13.6) |
Communication with the team | 48 | 60 | 68 | 87 | 4.5 (1.9-11.2) | 61 | 81 | 2.9 (1.3-6.5) |
Timeliness | 55 | 69 | 64 | 82 | 2.1 (0.9-4.7) | 54 | 72 | 1.2 (0.6-2.5) |
Appeal as a Role Model | 61 | 76 | 68 | 87 | 2.1 (0.9-5.5) | 66 | 88 | 2.3 (0.9-6.2) |
Quality of Bedside teaching | 33 | 41 | 57 | 73 | 3.9 (1.9-8.0) | 52 | 69 | 3.2 (1.6-6.6) |