|
Number of evaluation (n)
| | |
201
|
|
The lecturer was competent
|
1.3 (0.7)
|
1.7 (0.9)
|
< 0.001
|
|
The lecture was fun
|
1.5 (0.8)
|
1.5 (0.7)
|
0.816
|
|
I have learned alot
|
1.9 (1.0)
|
1.9 (0.9)
|
0.552
|
|
Theory and practice were well combined
|
1.6 (0.9)
|
1.9 (0.9)
|
0.001
|
|
The size of the group was optimal
|
2.3 (1.2)
|
2.3 (1.3)
|
0.631
|
|
The interaction between the group and the lecturer was good
|
1.6 (0.8)
|
1.6 (0.8)
|
0.691
|
|
Multidimensional augmentation in anatomical education makes sense
|
1.7 (0.9)
|
1.8 (0.9)
|
0.315
|
|
Structures were difficult to identify
|
3.2 (1.2)
|
2.6 (1.2)
|
< 0.001
|
|
Many of my questions stayed unanswered
|
3.9 (0.9)
|
3.6 (1.0)
|
0.004
|
|
I would need more lectures for deepening
|
2.1 (1.1)
|
1.8 (1.1
|
< 0.001
|
|
Generally the PAL concept is a good teaching method
|
1.8 (1.0)
|
1.8 (1.0)
|
0.991
|
|
Only a medical expert can teach these contents
|
3.2 (1.3)
|
3.6 (1.1)
|
< 0.001
|
|
Generally the contents were too comprehensive
|
4.0 (0.9)
|
3.7 (1.0)
|
0.003
|
|
I could improve my anatomical knowledge
|
1.9 (1.0)
|
2.3 (1.1)
|
0.002
|
|
The durability of my anatomical knowledge is raised
|
1.7 (0.9)
|
1.7 (0.9)
|
0.624
|
|
My spatial imagination was improved
|
1.6 (0.9)
|
2.0 (1.1)
|
< 0.001
|
|
I was better prepared for the practical exam (OSCE)
|
2.7 (1.2)
|
2.8 (1.2)
|
0.117
|
|
This lecture should later be introduced in the study
|
3.6 (1.3)
|
3.6 (1.3)
|
0.202
|
|
ASK and MSUS awaked my interest in surgery
|
2.4 (1.1)
|
2.4 (1.0)
|
0.899
|
