Table 4 Results of students response to the course evaluation questionnaire (in relation to assessment and educational resources) of the CVS module in (2009/2010) and (2010/2011)
Items of comparison | 2009/2010 Satisfaction N=129 % | 2010/2011 Satisfaction N=152 % | Test of significance |
|---|---|---|---|
Assessment | |||
Assessment methods were fair | 41.7 | 75 | P<0.001*** |
Assessment reflects what was taught. | 43.6 | 84 | P<0.001*** |
Assessment method challenge students more than memorize. | 50 | 85 | P<0.001*** |
Number of tests was reasonable for the course. | 55.4 | 76 | P=0.001** |
These is Formative assessment | 37.9 | 75 | P<0.001*** |
The time of formative assessment is suitable. | 37.9 | 75 | P<0.001*** |
Overall satisfaction | 44.5 | 65.8 | P<0.001*** |
Educational resources | |||
Educational materials were available. | 66.7 | 67 | P=0.96 |
Educational materials posted of EMES MED (education management of electronic system for Medicine) at earlier time. | 39.3 | 50 | P=0.084 |
I frequently use the library to search learning material. | 39.3 | 69 | P<0.001*** |
The library contains adequate number of books for the course. | 45.3 | 72 | P<0.001*** |
Lecture rooms are well-equipped. | 45.3 | 62 | P=0.006** |
Laboratories are well-equipped | 53.2 | 64 | P=0.084 |
Rooms for PBL are well constructed | 53.2 | 51 | P=0.81 |
Student’s study guide helped me much throughout the course. | 35.5 | 59 | P<0.001*** |
Overall satisfaction | 54 | 61.7 | P=0.23 |