Table 3 Results of students responses to course evaluation questionnaire (in relation to module contents and faculty members) of the CVS module in (2009/2010) and (2010/2011)
Items of comparison | 2009/2010 Satisfaction N=129 % | 2010/2011 Satisfaction N=152 % | Test of significance |
|---|---|---|---|
Module contents | |||
Objectives of course are clear | 69.5 | 93 | P<0.001*** |
Objectives of each teaching formats were explained at its start | 69 | 85 | P=0.002** |
The modules contents show relation between basic & clinical sciences | 81.1 | 89 | P=0.089 |
The practical part is related to the theoretical part | 67.4 | 87 | P<0.001*** |
This course help to develop my self-learning capacity | 63.3 | 86 | P<0.001*** |
PBL sessions improve my learning achievements | 61.7 | 80 | P=0.001** |
This course is good & useful for my future career | 80.9 | 94 | P<0.001*** |
Overall satisfaction | 70.5 | 87.5 | P<0.01** |
Faculty members | |||
address the contents of the module as stated study guide | 64 | 82 | P=0.002** |
encourage students to ask questions during teaching | 37.7 | 74 | P<0.001*** |
make good use of different types of educational methods | 46.1 | 73 | P<0.001*** |
Faculty members use clinical cases in teaching | 64.1 | 94 | P<0.001*** |
clearly explain the methods of assessment from the start of the course | 46.1 | 84 | P<0.001*** |
Faculty members provide positive feedback after each assessment | 34.2 | 70 | P<0.001*** |
encourage students for self-directed learning | 50.8 | 77 | P<0.001*** |
encourage students for electronic learning | 50.8 | 77 | P<0.001*** |
usually available in their office hours | 23.2 | 50 | P<0.001*** |
Overall satisfaction | 46.5 | 75.6 | P<0.001*** |