Skip to main content

Table 3 Post-test results in BLS-AED skills

From: Effects of introducing a voluntary virtual patient module to a basic life support with an automated external defibrillator course: a randomised trial

 

G1: n = 75

G2: n = 37

G3: n = 47

p

 

%

%

%

Safe approach performed

73.7%

78.1%

84.1%

0.45

Arouse shout performed

91.2%

96.9%

100.0%

-

Shake performed correctly

87.7%

90.6%

100.0%

-

Shout for help performed

75.4%

68.8%

70.5%

0.76

Open airway performed correctly

70.2%

78.1%

97.7%

<0.001

Check for signs of circulation correctly

59.7%

71.9%

88.6%

0.004

Phone for help performed

87.7%

96.9%

97.7%

-

Shout for AED

29.8%

28.1%

27.3%

0.96

Start with chest compression

93.0%

96.9%

93.2%

-

Correct identification of place for chest compression

93.0%

93.8%

95.5%

-

Correct C:V Ratio (30:2)

98.3%

100.0%

95.5%

-

Knows when to stop BLS

14.0%

21.9%

36.4%

0.03

No unnecessary breaks during BLS

82.4%

78.1%

86.4%

0.64

Average ventilation volume in [500–1000] ml

64.9%

68.8%

68.2%

0.91

Average compression depth in [40–50] mm

42.1%

34.4%

40.9%

0.76

If AED requested

n = 17

n = 9

n = 12

 

Safe use of AED:

81.3%

33.3%

81.8%

-

Correct electrode pad placement

68.8%

66.7%

100.0%

-

  1. G1: Control group, G2: Experimental group not using virtual patients, G3: Experimental group using virtual patients, p value in the χ 2 test for 3×2 contingency table, reported if test assumptions were met.