Skip to main content

Table 2 Opinion questionnaire after clinical sessions: Usefulness of Second Life for teaching I

From: Experience with using second life for medical education in a family and community medicine education unit

Question

Answer

% (n/N)

Do you consider this to be an interactive method?

“yes”

68.42% (52/76)

 

“partly”, “perhaps”

31.58% (24/76)

How did you feel about interacting with other health centres?

“good”, “very good”, “excellent”,“perfect”, “more participation”, “it's very important and it's also in real time”

100% (76/76)

What did you think about the interaction with teaching staff?

“good”, “adequate”

85.53% (65/76)

 

“little”, “minimal”

14.47% (11/76)

What did you think about the interaction with other health professionals?

“adequate”, “good”, “it works very well”

43.42% (33/76)

 

“almost non-existent”, “we wouldn’t have participated even if we could have”

56.58% (43/76)

Do you think it facilitates the exchange of medical information?

“yes”

77.63% (59/76)

 

“several people with a single connection limited participation”

22.37% (17/76)

 

no response

7.89% (6/76)

Do you think it facilitates learning?

“yes”, “of course” and “it’s a comfortable way”

100% (76/76)

Do you think it facilitates debate?

“yes”, “more when participation was on an individual basis”

22.37% (17/76)

 

“somewhat”, “it makes debate a little difficult”, “not so much, but it could”

60.53% (46/76)

 

“no”

9.21% (7/76)

 

no response

7.89% (6/76)

  1. SL: Second Life.