This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
What should we be selecting for? A systematic approach for determining which personal characteristics to assess for during admissions
© Conlon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 November 2011
Accepted: 25 October 2012
Published: 5 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Nov 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marlee Spafford|
|15 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bonnie Smith|
|22 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marilyn Baird|
|26 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michal Schneider-Kolsky|
|26 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kent Hecker|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bonnie Smith|
|29 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marlee Spafford|
|11 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marilyn Baird|
|15 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michal Schneider-Kolsky|
|5 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Kent Hecker|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|5 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-12-105|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.