Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Dimensionality and predictive validity of the HAM-Nat, a test of natural sciences for medical school admission

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Konrad Pesudovs
15 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manjula Marella
29 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Johanna Christine Hissbach
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Manjula Marella
17 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Konrad Pesudovs
4 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Johanna Christine Hissbach
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Johanna Christine Hissbach
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
14 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-11-83

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement