Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: More mentoring needed? A cross-sectional study of mentoring programs for medical students in Germany

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Felix G. Meinel
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Buddeberg-Fischer
31 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Felix G. Meinel
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Buddeberg-Fischer
29 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Felix G. Meinel
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Felix G. Meinel
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Felix G. Meinel
Resubmission - Version 6
20 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
24 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-11-68

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement