Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of exposed and unexposed groups

From: Exploring the perspectives of allied health practitioners toward the use of journal clubs as a medium for promoting evidence-based practice: a qualitative study

Category

Exposed

(AHP exposed to iCAHE JC)

Unexposed

(AHP who have no experience of iCAHE JC, but may have had exposure to other forms of JC)

Utility & benefits of a JC

• Venue for reflective practice and keeping up-to-date with research evidence

• Forum for learning critical appraisal of the literature

• Venue for reflective practice and keeping up-to-date with research evidence

• Forum for learning critical appraisal of the literature

Elements of an effective and sustainable JC

• Partnership between iCAHE and JCs, which can address issues related to lack of time to search, and access to the literature

• Good leadership

• Set time to meet

• Structured format for JC

Barriers to participation in a JC

• Heavy clinical workload

• Limited knowledge of statistics

• Heavy clinical workload

• Limited knowledge of statistics

• Lack of skills in searching for relevant literature

• Limited access to evidence-based databases

Incentives for participation in a JC

• Shared responsibility within the group

• Allocation of CPD points

• Shared responsibility within the group

• Allocation of CPD points

Opportunities for improvement

• Training to all JC members

• Provision of self-help kits on statistics

• More regular contact with iCAHE researchers

--------