Skip to main content

Table 3 Student Satisfaction with the On-site and On-line Biostatistics Courses (Section 1)

From: A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study

Variable

Arm 1

On-site Biostatistics

Arm 2

On-line Biostatistics

p value*

 

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

 

The course content matched the defined course objectives

0

0

1

14

15

0

0

2

11

15

0.909

The course materials improved/enhanced learning of the subject

0

0

4

11

15

0

0

1

13

14

0.722

The live talks enhanced learning in courses.

0

0

3

8

19

0

1

14

8

5

0.001

The course was organized in an appropriate way to learn the concepts outlined in the course objectives

0

0

1

15

14

0

0

4

18

6

0.025

Constructive feedback was given during live talks

0

0

3

15

12

0

2

11

11

4

0.001

Course topics were related to the main ideas in the course

0

0

1

15

14

0

0

0

18

10

0.505

Class materials related to the broader context of biomedical research

0

1

0

13

16

0

0

2

18

8

0.059

The course will be valuable to my work in biomedical research

0

0

0

9

21

0

0

1

10

17

0.413

The course instructors explained the material clearly.

0

0

1

9

20

0

0

1

16

11

0.048

The course instructors held my interest during the course

0

0

0

8

22

0

0

4

12

12

0.010

The course instructors held my interest during the course

0

0

3

8

19

0

2

10

11

5

< 0.001

The course instructors were accessible/approachable

0

0

1

2

27

0

0

5

12

11

< 0.001

  1. 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = somewhat agree; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree
  2. *p values are based on comparisons using chi-squared test for trend. Data with p values below 0.05 are shown in bold.