Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A Comparison of Online versus On-site Training in Health Research Methodology: A Randomized Study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Lillis
21 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Clifford Packer
25 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vernon Curran
23 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rakesh Aggarwal
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steven Lillis
6 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Clifford Packer
11 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vernon Curran
15 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rakesh Aggarwal
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rakesh Aggarwal
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Jun 2011 Editorially accepted
17 Jun 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-11-37

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement