Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Modification of an OSCE format to enhance patient continuity in a high-stakes assessment of clinical performance

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danette McKinley
25 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matt Homer
17 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rose Hatala
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matt Homer
11 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Danette McKinley
6 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rose Hatala
Resubmission - Version 3
6 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Rose Hatala
Resubmission - Version 4
16 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
24 May 2011 Editorially accepted
24 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-11-23

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement