Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Teaching tools in Evidence Based Practice: evaluation of reusable learning objects (RLOs) for learning about Meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - uzma zafar
1 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - manjeet shehmar
9 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Ball
20 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Hadley
8 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Heather Wharrad
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Heather Wharrad
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Hadley
21 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Heather Wharrad
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Heather Wharrad
Resubmission - Version 5
4 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
4 May 2011 Editorially accepted
4 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-11-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement