Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Why not just Google it? An assessment of information literacy skills in a biomedical science curriculum

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - patricia sexton
1 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Hawken
2 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Are Holen
16 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masami Tagawa
22 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Karl Kingsley
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - patricia sexton
8 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Hawken
16 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Are Holen
17 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masami Tagawa
30 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Karl Kingsley
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Karl Kingsley
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Karl Kingsley
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
19 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Karl Kingsley
Resubmission - Version 7
19 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
25 Apr 2011 Editorially accepted
25 Apr 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-11-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement