Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Factors confounding the assessment of reflection: a critical review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Ross
2 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sandars
26 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristi Ferguson
10 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sebastiaan Koole
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sebastiaan Koole
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sebastiaan Koole
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Dec 2011 Editorially accepted
28 Dec 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-11-104

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement