Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors confounding the assessment of reflection: a critical review

  • Sebastiaan Koole1Email author,
  • Tim Dornan2,
  • Leen Aper1,
  • Albert Scherpbier3,
  • Martin Valcke4,
  • Janke Cohen-Schotanus5 and
  • Anselme Derese1
BMC Medical Education201111:104

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-104

Received: 15 June 2011

Accepted: 28 December 2011

Published: 28 December 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jun 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Ross
2 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Sandars
26 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kristi Ferguson
10 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sebastiaan Koole
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sebastiaan Koole
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sebastiaan Koole
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Dec 2011 Editorially accepted
28 Dec 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6920-11-104

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
(2)
Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
(3)
Institute for Medical Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
(4)
Department of Educational Studies, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
(5)
Centre for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Advertisement