Initiating undergraduate medical students into communities of research practise: what do supervisors recommend?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Mar 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Hays|
|24 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lyndal Trevena|
|30 Sep 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Margaret MacDougall|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Sep 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Hays|
|2 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lyndal Trevena|
|11 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Margaret MacDougall|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Nov 2010||Editorially accepted|
|19 Nov 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6920-10-83|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.